<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Karratti.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://karratti.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://karratti.com</link>
	<description>Official Portfolio of Brandon Karratti</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 21:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 8-Part Story Structure: Eighth Sequence by Jack</title>
		<link>http://karratti.com/2010/03/28/8-part-story-structure-eighth-sequence/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 21:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sounfocused.wordpress.com/?p=319#comment-720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for sharing.  I learned a lot.  I hope this task was beneficial for you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing.  I learned a lot.  I hope this task was beneficial for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 8-Part Story Structure: First Sequence by Some Tools for Beginning Script Writing &#171; Warrens Zombie Movie</title>
		<link>http://karratti.com/2008/06/26/8-part-story-structure-first-sequence/#comment-631</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Some Tools for Beginning Script Writing &#171; Warrens Zombie Movie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 20:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sounfocused.wordpress.com/?p=191#comment-631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Eight Part Story Structure (plot structure) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eight Part Story Structure (plot structure) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Simple-Minded Gamers by Bryant</title>
		<link>http://karratti.com/2011/03/26/simple-minded-gamers/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 07:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karratti.com/?p=1160#comment-533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sir, I am a gamer, and one of few who are exactly what you describe in your fifth paragraph. I think of games as art, but then there are the games that want to be art, but are not perceived as so by the general public, such as Call of Duty: Black Ops. Now, let&#039;s not kid ourselves, games are a means of entertainment, and when it comes to constant top selling titles, a game series begins to loose its luster. And that&#039;s exactly what is happening right now with Call of Duty and Battlefield. Battlefield, which is a game series that cares about its appearance and quality, is just now starting to appeal to the mainstream, and... well... stupid console crowd who have come to tire of there dim and inadequate lives of only playing Call of Duty. And so they find another game to sink their little hands into and poison with Imbecility.

But in all, I suppose this is due to the invention of the First Person Shooter. A genre that appeals to the very essence of our humanity, yet that we cannot achieve due to moral standards and societal restrictions. It is to kill. Who wouldn&#039;t wanna know what it was like to kill another being with absolutely no consequences (not that video games can or ever will simulate a life and death struggle)? This has turned us all into shallow moron cattle that are just waiting for the next bag of cow feed. Oooh, everyone&#039;s just waiting for the next big shooter to come out that has &quot;revolutionary&quot; multiplayer that is &quot;funner than ever!&quot; We are, in fact, the sheep of the fat cat herders at EA and Activision. There are games like Red Dead Redemption, which exposes the player to the hardships of one John Marston and his physical and emotional struggles as he fights to redeem himself, but is that what is fun about the game? Sure, maybe if it was a movie. But the fun part about the game, as masterfully and intellectually the plot and characters may have been crafted, is that you can shoot people dead and get away with it. Now, I do appreciate a good story and RDR was one of the most emotional and gripping stories I&#039;ve ever experienced in a video game, but I admit, it sure was satisfying to shoot a criminal, or civilian, whatever the case may be, right in the face. Not that I am some sort of demented psycho killer, but it&#039;s just fun, an escape if you will.

Games like L.A. Noire have proven you don&#039;t need a violent war game to have fun, however, the mainstream gamer community is brainwashed to believe differently, thus meaning big bucks for the producers of big hits like Call of Duty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir, I am a gamer, and one of few who are exactly what you describe in your fifth paragraph. I think of games as art, but then there are the games that want to be art, but are not perceived as so by the general public, such as Call of Duty: Black Ops. Now, let&#8217;s not kid ourselves, games are a means of entertainment, and when it comes to constant top selling titles, a game series begins to loose its luster. And that&#8217;s exactly what is happening right now with Call of Duty and Battlefield. Battlefield, which is a game series that cares about its appearance and quality, is just now starting to appeal to the mainstream, and&#8230; well&#8230; stupid console crowd who have come to tire of there dim and inadequate lives of only playing Call of Duty. And so they find another game to sink their little hands into and poison with Imbecility.</p>
<p>But in all, I suppose this is due to the invention of the First Person Shooter. A genre that appeals to the very essence of our humanity, yet that we cannot achieve due to moral standards and societal restrictions. It is to kill. Who wouldn&#8217;t wanna know what it was like to kill another being with absolutely no consequences (not that video games can or ever will simulate a life and death struggle)? This has turned us all into shallow moron cattle that are just waiting for the next bag of cow feed. Oooh, everyone&#8217;s just waiting for the next big shooter to come out that has &#8220;revolutionary&#8221; multiplayer that is &#8220;funner than ever!&#8221; We are, in fact, the sheep of the fat cat herders at EA and Activision. There are games like Red Dead Redemption, which exposes the player to the hardships of one John Marston and his physical and emotional struggles as he fights to redeem himself, but is that what is fun about the game? Sure, maybe if it was a movie. But the fun part about the game, as masterfully and intellectually the plot and characters may have been crafted, is that you can shoot people dead and get away with it. Now, I do appreciate a good story and RDR was one of the most emotional and gripping stories I&#8217;ve ever experienced in a video game, but I admit, it sure was satisfying to shoot a criminal, or civilian, whatever the case may be, right in the face. Not that I am some sort of demented psycho killer, but it&#8217;s just fun, an escape if you will.</p>
<p>Games like L.A. Noire have proven you don&#8217;t need a violent war game to have fun, however, the mainstream gamer community is brainwashed to believe differently, thus meaning big bucks for the producers of big hits like Call of Duty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

